Get rid of ohai

Registered by Ivan Suzdal

Ohai required support additional packages,
and unfortunatelly, not all of them are
opensource friendly (ruby-sigar, for example).

This changes will let us to rid ruby-mixlib*,
ruby-sigar and ruby-yajl packages.

Also, it may sound strange, but ohai[:virtualization]
makes decision based on /proc/cpuinfo information
only (this applies only to kvm/qemu, other virt-systems
determines correctly, AFAICS).

So, if someone will choose a non-default (qemu)
processor configuration, ohai will return incomplete
information about virtualization on a kvm-based virtual host.

Blueprint information

Status:
Not started
Approver:
None
Priority:
Undefined
Drafter:
Ivan Suzdal
Direction:
Needs approval
Assignee:
None
Definition:
New
Series goal:
None
Implementation:
Unknown
Milestone target:
None

Related branches

Sprints

Whiteboard

Addressed by: https://review.openstack.org/314642
    Let's get rid of ohai.

Gerrit topic: https://review.openstack.org/#q,topic:bp/get-rid-of-ohai,n,z

Addressed by: https://review.openstack.org/359270
    Let's get rid of ohai.

Addressed by: https://review.openstack.org/367786
    Let's get rid of ohai.

Addressed by: https://review.openstack.org/370925
    Let's get rid of ohai.

Addressed by: https://review.openstack.org/374290
    Let's get rid of ohai.

Addressed by: https://review.openstack.org/436439
    Remove ohai dependencies

(?)

Work Items

This blueprint contains Public information 
Everyone can see this information.

Subscribers

No subscribers.