Developer Membership Board Checkpoint

ScottK Let's not do this. Not all of the DMB is available. We made good progress at our last meeting and we should keep at the work there.

dholbach: I don't think we need all of the DMB in a session to give everyone the opportunity to give some feedback and think collectively about what might be good ideas for the next time. The discussion on the mailing list also brought up a number of ideas, let's discuss them there.

stefanor: erm, not convinced we want a vUDS DMB meeting if we can't get the majority of the DMB. It's not like we're all going to be in the same room (which was good motivation for previous UDS DMB meetings). I'm slightly worried about a "good ideas for next time" topic too, that sounds like something that'd get into specifics of individuals' applications very quickly. I'd prefer not to do that in public if we don't have to.

barry: I'm also not convinced this will be useful, but I'm subscribing anyway (and will be there if the session is held).

dholbach: I don't think we need to go into specifics of individual applications, but I do believe that it will be helpful to find out from the attendees of the session how for example expectations can be set differently and maybe more accurately. If you review the discussion on ubuntu-devel@ and the log of the DMB/CC sync-up, you will see that there's a lot of interest in this.