Review of the ARB process using MyApps
With lots of work put into https:/
Blueprint information
- Status:
- Not started
- Approver:
- Jono Bacon
- Priority:
- Undefined
- Drafter:
- Daniel Holbach
- Direction:
- Approved
- Assignee:
- None
- Definition:
- Approved
- Series goal:
- Accepted for quantal
- Implementation:
-
Unknown
- Milestone target:
-
ubuntu-12.10
- Started by
- Completed by
Whiteboard
* On a separate topic, the https:/
* Do they need the same level of permissions as ARB members? It's fine to have the same permissions, the actual publishing can only be done by ARB members anyway
* PPA upload user interface:
* Anthony: it'd be nice to have a generic interface that would enable to specify diferent sources of submission apart from PPAs (e.g. github, PPA). Having a URL vs. a "PPA dropdown" would have the benefit of being able to specify a PPA even if the submitter is not its owner
* ARB: either would be fine
* Particular bugs to discuss:
* Feature request: log all actions in feedback (https:/
* problems:
* hard to find out which apps need attention
* make it easier to see if last comment is from ARB / arb-helper member or not
* ubuntu-
* priority list:
* 987996 Automatically change application to review pending when a dev adds a comment
* 927553 ARB team is never notified about app developer's comments on the 'Feedback' page
* Solutions:
* with fixes last cycle, no longer need special metadata in debian/rules and debian/control
Work Items
Work items for quantal-alpha-1:
[dholbach] update description of bug 920428: DONE
Work items:
[ajmitch] File bug about package description in Software Centre not having line breaks: TODO
[allison] update documentation, no longer require meta-data: DONE
[elachuni] update https:/
