GNOME Version
discuss what GNOME version we will track for the LTS.
Blueprint information
- Status:
- Complete
- Approver:
- Martin Pitt
- Priority:
- Essential
- Drafter:
- Sebastien Bacher
- Direction:
- Approved
- Assignee:
- None
- Definition:
- Approved
- Series goal:
- Accepted for precise
- Implementation:
- Implemented
- Milestone target:
- ubuntu-12.04-beta-1
- Started by
- Martin Pitt
- Completed by
- Martin Pitt
Whiteboard
Work Items:
[seb128] discuss the gtk situation with desrt and what to do: DONE
[seb128] check with pitti or discuss with upstream if a glib and gvfs version mismatch would work (no issue): DONE
document on the etherpad what we update and what we don't update and why: DONE
[rodrigo-moya] check that we can update gnome-settings-
Work Items for precise-alpha-2:
[seb128] decide (at the rally) on what version of GTK to use: DONE
Work items for ubuntu-
[seb128] talk to design,dx what to do for applications that expose a menu and an application menu (the new ones exported by gmenu): DONE
Work items for ubuntu-12.04:
[seb128] talk to debian about renaming epiphany and dconf: POSTPONED
[seb128] talk to jasoncwarner about bringing the 2 years "GNOME lts" topic to their adboard: DONE
2012-01-09: we will use gtk 3.4
g-c-c and g-s-d will stay on 3.2
UDS Session notes:
* platform
- glib, 2.32: mainloop improvements, monothonic time?, epool?, gmenu (required for dx work), gsettings (dconf will need to be updated)
-> we will update to the current glib
- gtk 3.4: kinectic scrolling, multitouch (conflicting with utouch?), menu integration being done, a11y improvements
if gtk gets multitouch upstream in a different way we might not expose those apis on Ubuntu
-> that will need to be resolved
-> once that's resolved decide on wheter we go with 3.4 or do backporting to 3.2
- gvfs: should be keep it in sync with glib? new gvfs will likely depends on udisk2 (rewrite) which we probably don't want to take for the lts
* applications:
- by default stay on 3.2, pick up some new components:
gnome-games
gedit
gcalctool
some other easy ones (eog?, yelp? evince?)
- gnome-control-
- empathy: stay behind? the new version requires clutter...
- nautilus: stay on 3.2, we don't want the new udisk rewrite and there is no strong reason to update this cycle
- things not on the CD can be updated to 3.4
- evolution: stay on 3.2
- totem: stay on 3.0 we don't want video playing to depends on clutter for the lts
- webkit: go for 1.8, it's a platform component, we need to figure if 1.8 will still support gtk2 before though
- gconf and gtk2 will probably remain on the CD...
* other topic:
- lts cycles for GNOME? Something that came up during GNOME asia, there is a demand for it from different distributors (debian, novell, ...)
good idea -> to bring to the adboard