Ubuntu GNOME Website Look and Feel
This blueprint to discuss the improvement of the look and feel of Ubuntu GNOME Website. This project will be a mutual collaboration between The Artwork Team and Marketing & Communications Team.
Blueprint information
- Status:
- Started
- Approver:
- amjjawad
- Priority:
- High
- Drafter:
- amjjawad
- Direction:
- Needs approval
- Assignee:
- None
- Definition:
- Discussion
- Series goal:
- None
- Implementation:
- Slow progress
- Milestone target:
- None
- Started by
- amjjawad
- Completed by
Related branches
Related bugs
Sprints
Whiteboard
[Niels Vermaut] "As ideas go, I would like to keep the website as clean and simple as possible. I could add in fancy effects like Parallax Scrolling, but I don't see the added value for that. I also would advice against sliders, and just use a small animated header with Animate.css.
As far as Brand consistency goes, you guys need to fill me in :). I'm also always wanting to listen to new ideas!
Is there a need for a custom Wiki, or are we going to use the Ubuntu Main one? And is there a need for a knowledge base of some sort? Because I also could look into something like that!
The draft I made is available at 188.226.254.37"
-------
[aldomann] Sorry Neils, I had a very basic mockup and our great Satyajit came up with this thing: http://
As you can see, it keeps simplicity as its main feature whilst showing a modern design.
We shall discuss what navigation links we need to include in the web (Blog, community, etc.) but this design should help.
-------
[Niels Vermaut] "That design does look very well, and If I get the go signal from one of you guys, I could start working on it tomorrow. The only thing I would change is I would put the latest news article under the download button. Anyone having a problem with that, or having another suggestion, I'm all ears."
-------
[aldomann] Let's wait for the Communications team folks to hear their opinions on the website structure.
-------
[Niels Vermaut] "Okay, will hold my horses :). The only thing to consider is that now I have a lot of free time, execution could be done very quickly. However, this will change in July and August. Not that I won't have any time, but I won't achieve completion in one or two days then."
-------
[jamesvorder] Are we still pursuing this? If so, we should really set up a shared folder of some sort to house our PSDs, create more detailed mock-ups of each page. I can help with this (even though I'm not part of the correct teams,) if we still want to pursue the redesign.
-------
[Logical] Hi, I am new at this community, so don't get mad at any of my ideas :)
I suggest that we go for "fancy effects", like Niels said. We should make a website that differs from others.
If you watch websites like:
http://
https:/
http://
http://
https:/
https:/
https:/
http://
https:/
All these websites are static, they are functional but not inviting (for me). I suggest that we add some effects simple parallax or some basic nice effects, but not fancy stuff sparkling and that. I will make some examples of what i mean.
Why we should do it this way?
-because it will make the visitor want to try out the distro
-it something new,
-it also gives the visitor the feeling that the community is keeping up, inviting
-etc
-------
[aldomann] Fancy effects may be different, but not better. They only end up slowing down the website, specially parallax. We need a pretty, yet functional (parallax is anything but functional) design.
We already have a somehow final design (or definitely a design route, if you want); we are just discussing technical stuff before we start implementing it all.
Work Items
Dependency tree
* Blueprints in grey have been implemented.